CL-SN55 941 —
GPT-56T 861 —
GPT-6S 837 —
GPT-56SC 837 +8.6%
CL-OP55X 831 +8.8%
GROK-46H 831 +8.8%
DSK-V4PH 831 +8.8%
GLM-52 822 +3.9%
GPT-61S 818 —
MUSE-SPK 804 -3.9%
CL-FAB5H 749 +9.8%
GLM-5 749 -3.9%
CL-OP5H 724 +10.2%
CL-OP5X 722 +10.2%
QWEN-38X 722 -3.9%
GEM-37FH 720 +10.3%
KIMI-K3X 718 -3.6%
CL-OP46H 707 +10.5%
CL-OP55H 705 +10.5%
GPT-6A 704 -5.1%
CL-OP47H 696 +10.7%
GEM-38FH 687 -3.5%
GEM-36FH 647 +11.6%
CL-OP48H 644 +11.6%
GEM-35FH 630 +11.9%
GPT-55H 588 +12.6%
GPT-56S 586 -0.5%
CL-OP47 550 -0.5%
INKL 531 —
GEM-3P 495 —
CL-OP46 491 -0.2%
GEM-31P 489 -2%
CL-OP48 485 —
GPT-6L 436 —
GPT-55 398 -2%
CL-SN55 941 —
GPT-56T 861 —
GPT-6S 837 —
GPT-56SC 837 +8.6%
CL-OP55X 831 +8.8%
GROK-46H 831 +8.8%
DSK-V4PH 831 +8.8%
GLM-52 822 +3.9%
GPT-61S 818 —
MUSE-SPK 804 -3.9%
CL-FAB5H 749 +9.8%
GLM-5 749 -3.9%
CL-OP5H 724 +10.2%
CL-OP5X 722 +10.2%
QWEN-38X 722 -3.9%
GEM-37FH 720 +10.3%
KIMI-K3X 718 -3.6%
CL-OP46H 707 +10.5%
CL-OP55H 705 +10.5%
GPT-6A 704 -5.1%
CL-OP47H 696 +10.7%
GEM-38FH 687 -3.5%
GEM-36FH 647 +11.6%
CL-OP48H 644 +11.6%
GEM-35FH 630 +11.9%
GPT-55H 588 +12.6%
GPT-56S 586 -0.5%
CL-OP47 550 -0.5%
INKL 531 —
GEM-3P 495 —
CL-OP46 491 -0.2%
GEM-31P 489 -2%
CL-OP48 485 —
GPT-6L 436 —
GPT-55 398 -2%
← Back to feed

Grok 4.6 Reaches Intelligence Index 61 — SpaceXAI Matches GPT-5.6 Sol at $2 Per Million

SpaceXAI released Grok 4.6 on August 12, 2026, the company’s first frontier update since Grok 4.5 shipped in late June. The model reaches an Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 61, matching OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol at the frontier tier while holding its price at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens.

Where It Lands

The Intelligence Index 61 slots Grok 4.6 into the cluster behind Anthropic’s two leaders:

ModelAA Intelligence IndexInput / Output per 1M
Claude Opus 5 (max)63$5 / $25
Claude Fable 5 (max)62$15 / $75
Grok 4.661$2 / $6
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)61$5 / $30
Kimi K3~60$3 / $15

The 5-point gain over Grok 4.5 (56) came from a longer supplemental training run rather than a parameter increase. The model retains the same 1.5-trillion-parameter V9 foundation but received improved SFT trajectories regenerated by Grok 4.5 across reasoning, coding, and knowledge domains, followed by agentic reinforcement learning on kernel optimisation, web development, and computer-aided design environments.

Agentic Work Is the Story

On GDPval-AA v2, Artificial Analysis’s long-horizon knowledge work evaluation, Grok 4.6 scores 1753 Elo, behind only Claude Opus 5 and within confidence intervals of Fable 5 and Qwen3.8 Max.

On AA-Briefcase, a private long-horizon agentic benchmark, it lands at 1577 Elo — Fable 5 tier — but completes tasks in 53 turns on average against 103 turns for Claude Opus 5. That turn efficiency drives the cost: AA clocks its cost per task at $0.84, the same as Kimi K3.

SpaceXAI’s own evaluation table:

  • DeepSWE v1.1: 65.9% (Grok 4.5: 54%; GPT-5.6 Sol Max: 73%)
  • Terminal-Bench v2.1: 88.4%
  • τ³-Banking: 50.7% (tied with Qwen3.8 Max at the top of this category)

Availability and Pricing

Grok 4.6 is live on the xAI API, Grok Build, Cursor on all plans, OpenRouter, Vercel, and Cloudflare. Context window is 500K tokens, unchanged from Grok 4.5. Cache hits price at $0.50 per million tokens, up from $0.30. SpaceXAI is doubling included usage inside Grok Build and Cursor for the first week.

What It Does Not Claim

No SWE-bench Verified score was published for Grok 4.6. DeepSWE v1.1 (65.9%) uses a different task distribution and harness from SWE-bench Verified, making direct comparison to Fable 5’s 95% or Opus 5’s 97% unreliable. The benchmark figures in the SpaceXAI launch table are self-reported; no independent evaluation has confirmed them.

The strategic position is clear regardless: frontier-tier general capability at a price point 60% below the models it now ties.