← Back to feed

Nebraska requires large data centers to file annual reports on water and electricity consumption. When Google submitted its 2026 filing for the Lincoln facility, the redaction did not hold.

Black bars intended to conceal the company’s actual usage figures were ineffective. The improperly redacted document revealed that Google’s Lincoln data center consumed 13.299 million gallons of water over the past year — approximately 50.3 million liters — drawn primarily across the facility’s cooling towers and related systems.

Google publishes facility-level water consumption data for a selection of its sites in annual environmental reports. It has not publicly acknowledged the Lincoln figures or commented on the redaction disclosure. The Nebraska filing produced something different: a number that surfaced through the state’s own regulatory process, not a schedule or format of Google’s choosing.

How the Disclosure Happened

Nebraska’s data center reporting program is a condition of the state’s incentive structure for large technology facilities. Companies that receive data center tax exemptions or economic development packages are required to submit annual usage reports to state regulators. The filings are not automatically public, but they enter the public record when requested.

In this case, 1011 Now, a Lincoln television news outlet, reported that regulators had received the improperly redacted document as part of the state’s annual data center reporting cycle. The outlet confirmed the water figure — 13.299 million gallons, or about 50.3 million liters — from the filing. Both water and electricity usage were accidentally disclosed. The filing also revealed 52.65 MW of peak electricity demand for the facility.

Google has not commented on the disclosure.

The Narrower Picture in a Wider Debate

The accidental Lincoln disclosure arrived nine days after Texas Governor Greg Abbott directed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to halt all new data center permits on September 21, pending completion of a state-wide grid and resource audit. Earlier in September, Abbott had ordered the Texas Water Development Board to pursue enforcement after data centers returned only 28% compliance on a mandatory water usage survey. Dutch investigators that same week found fewer than 25% of large Netherlands facilities have public energy figures, despite a three-year EU reporting mandate.

Both enforcement failures share the same shape: laws exist requiring disclosure, but most of the industry has not complied, and regulators have historically lacked the tools or willingness to compel it.

The Nebraska case inverts that pattern. The data center provided the required filing. The company’s own redaction error did the rest.

What Facility-Level Numbers Enable

The kind of disclosure Nebraska’s program produced differs from what appears in voluntary corporate sustainability reports. The city of Lincoln draws its water from wellfields along the Platte River near Ashland, roughly 30 miles from the city. Local utility and water planning decisions are made on the basis of projected demand from industrial users, including data centers. A voluntary figure published on a company’s own schedule cannot substitute for data submitted under regulatory obligation, tied to a specific address, within a specific jurisdiction.

13.299 million gallons over twelve months works out to roughly 36,400 gallons per day. Contextualizing that against Lincoln’s total water supply or the facility’s power consumption would require additional figures that are not publicly available. What is available is the number itself — and that it came from accident rather than policy.

Nebraska’s reporting requirement is now producing, inadvertently, precisely the kind of facility-specific data that environmental groups, water utilities, and municipal planners have spent years asking for. If the disclosure prompts a formal public records process or regulatory review, the Lincoln filing could set a precedent for what the state’s program is actually supposed to surface.