CL-SN55 941 —
GPT-61S 890 —
GPT-56T 861 —
GPT-6S 837 -1.2%
CL-OP55X 831 -1.4%
MUSE-SPK 804 —
QWEN-38X 795 —
GPT-6A 782 —
CL-OP5H 724 -1.6%
CL-OP5X 722 -1.6%
KIMI-K3X 718 -0.1%
CL-OP46H 707 -1.7%
CL-FAB5H 705 -7.4%
CL-OP55H 705 -1.7%
CL-OP47H 696 -1.7%
GEM-37FH 661 -9.7%
GEM-38FH 656 -4.8%
GPT-56S 580 -0.5%
CL-OP47 545 -0.5%
INKL 531 —
GEM-3P 494 -0.2%
CL-OP46 491 —
GEM-31P 486 -0.4%
CL-OP48 484 —
GPT-6L 436 —
CL-SN55 941 —
GPT-61S 890 —
GPT-56T 861 —
GPT-6S 837 -1.2%
CL-OP55X 831 -1.4%
MUSE-SPK 804 —
QWEN-38X 795 —
GPT-6A 782 —
CL-OP5H 724 -1.6%
CL-OP5X 722 -1.6%
KIMI-K3X 718 -0.1%
CL-OP46H 707 -1.7%
CL-FAB5H 705 -7.4%
CL-OP55H 705 -1.7%
CL-OP47H 696 -1.7%
GEM-37FH 661 -9.7%
GEM-38FH 656 -4.8%
GPT-56S 580 -0.5%
CL-OP47 545 -0.5%
INKL 531 —
GEM-3P 494 -0.2%
CL-OP46 491 —
GEM-31P 486 -0.4%
CL-OP48 484 —
GPT-6L 436 —
← Back to feed

Fireworks Ember-1 Cuts Reasoning Token Use 40% on Kimi K3 Base at $3/$15 Per Million

Fireworks Research released Ember-1 on September 23, a reasoning model built on Kimi K3, the 2.8 trillion parameter open-weight model from Moonshot AI. The defining claim: Ember-1 produces reasoning traces that are 40% shorter than Kimi K3’s baseline while maintaining comparable quality across Fireworks’ benchmark suite.

Specs

  • Base model: Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI, 2.8T MoE open-weight)
  • Pricing: $3 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
  • Context: 1M tokens
  • Inputs: Text and images
  • Released: September 23, 2026

Pricing matches the base Kimi K3 rate. The token reduction is the efficiency gain — shorter reasoning traces mean fewer billed tokens per query at the same cost per million.

The Efficiency Case

Kimi K3 scores 93.4% on SWE-bench Verified, placing it third on that leaderboard behind Claude Opus 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro. Its reasoning capability is frontier-grade. Ember-1’s premise is that most production tasks do not require the full depth of Kimi K3’s reasoning traces — and that a model fine-tuned to find shorter paths can deliver similar output at lower token cost.

The 40% figure comes from Fireworks’ internal evaluations on coding and knowledge work tasks. No independent benchmark runs have been published. Fireworks describes the quality gap as “comparable” without specifying a threshold.

Why Agentic Workflows

Token overhead in reasoning models compounds in agentic loops. A coding agent making 20 sequential calls to a model that generates 2,000 thinking tokens per call accumulates 40,000 reasoning tokens per task. At 40% reduction, that drops to 24,000. At $15/M output, the saved 16,000 reasoning tokens cut $0.24 per task — meaningful across thousands of daily agent runs.

Ember-1 is served via OpenRouter through a single provider. It is available for immediate use via OpenRouter’s API.

Context

At least two other labs productized Kimi K3 before Ember-1: Abacus.AI fine-tuned the same model in August into an agentic specialist that exceeded Kimi K3 on four separate benchmarks, and Cognition AI released SWE-2 on the same base in September. Moonshot AI released Kimi K3 under an open license in July, enabling downstream specialization. Ember-1 targets the opposite end of the trade-off: fewer tokens, same quality, lower cost per run rather than higher benchmark ceiling.