GPT-56T 861 —
MUSE-SPK 837 +0.2%
GPT-56SC 790 -4.6%
GLM-5 781 -0.4%
CL-OP55X 780 -5.1%
GROK-46H 780 -5.1%
QWEN-38X 748 -9.2%
GPT-6A 743 -9.4%
KIMI-K3X 742 —
CL-FAB5H 698 -6.1%
CL-OP5H 675 -6.2%
GEM-38FH 672 -0.7%
CL-OP5X 670 -5.5%
CL-OP55H 668 —
CL-OP46H 657 -5.9%
CL-OP47H 648 -6.1%
GPT-56S 618 -0.6%
GEM-37FH 610 -7.2%
GEM-36FH 593 —
CL-OP48H 588 —
CL-OP47 581 -0.2%
GEM-35FH 580 —
GPT-55H 541 -7%
INKL 531 —
GEM-31P 512 -0.2%
CL-OP46 498 +0.4%
GEM-3P 498 -0.2%
CL-OP48 492 +0.4%
GPT-52 464 —
GPT-55 423 —
GPT-56T 861 —
MUSE-SPK 837 +0.2%
GPT-56SC 790 -4.6%
GLM-5 781 -0.4%
CL-OP55X 780 -5.1%
GROK-46H 780 -5.1%
QWEN-38X 748 -9.2%
GPT-6A 743 -9.4%
KIMI-K3X 742 —
CL-FAB5H 698 -6.1%
CL-OP5H 675 -6.2%
GEM-38FH 672 -0.7%
CL-OP5X 670 -5.5%
CL-OP55H 668 —
CL-OP46H 657 -5.9%
CL-OP47H 648 -6.1%
GPT-56S 618 -0.6%
GEM-37FH 610 -7.2%
GEM-36FH 593 —
CL-OP48H 588 —
CL-OP47 581 -0.2%
GEM-35FH 580 —
GPT-55H 541 -7%
INKL 531 —
GEM-31P 512 -0.2%
CL-OP46 498 +0.4%
GEM-3P 498 -0.2%
CL-OP48 492 +0.4%
GPT-52 464 —
GPT-55 423 —
← Back to feed

DeepSeek V4 Flash Ships at $0.14/M: 79% SWE-Bench Verified on 13B Active Parameters

DeepSeek shipped both V4 variants live today, April 24. The Flash is the story worth watching closely.

The Flash Numbers

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is a 284B parameter Mixture-of-Experts model that activates only 13B parameters per forward pass. That architecture choice is why the pricing works: $0.14/M input, $0.28/M output, with cache hits at $0.028/M — a 97.5% discount on repeated context.

Performance against V4-Pro shows a narrow gap on most benchmarks:

BenchmarkV4-FlashV4-ProDelta
SWE-Bench Verified79.0%80.6%-1.6 pp
MMLU-Pro86.2%87.5%-1.3 pp
LiveCodeBench91.6%93.5%-1.9 pp
Codeforces30523206-4.8%
Terminal-Bench 2.056.9%67.9%-11 pp
SimpleQA-Verified34.1%57.9%-23.8 pp

The 1-2 point gap on coding benchmarks is within run variance. The 11-point drop on Terminal-Bench 2.0 and the 24-point drop on SimpleQA-Verified are the real tells: Flash weakens on complex multi-step tool use and detailed factual recall. For most automated coding pipelines, that tradeoff is acceptable.

Against the Field

V4-Flash’s 79.0% SWE-Verified puts it ahead of Gemini 2.5 Pro (78%) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (73%), level with GPT-5.4 within error bars, and 1.6 points behind V4-Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 (both at ~80.6-80.8%).

Pricing comparison against models at similar capability:

ModelInput $/MOutput $/MSWE-Verified
DeepSeek V4-Flash$0.14$0.2879.0%
DeepSeek V4-Pro$1.74$3.4880.6%
GPT-5.4$2.50$15.00~80%
Claude Opus 4.6$5.00$25.0080.8%

V4-Flash is 18x cheaper on input and 54x cheaper on output than Claude Opus 4.6 while sitting 1.8 percentage points behind on SWE-Verified.

Architecture: DSA and Long Context

Both V4 models introduce DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) with token-wise compression, which DeepSeek says achieves “world-leading long context with drastically reduced compute and memory costs.” The 1M token context is standard across both models with no surcharge — a direct contrast to GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6, which apply 2x pricing past 272K and 200K tokens respectively.

Maximum output is 384K tokens. Both models support thinking and non-thinking modes, JSON output, tool calls, and OpenAI-compatible as well as Anthropic-compatible APIs.

Retirement Timeline

DeepSeek is retiring the legacy deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner endpoints on July 24, 2026. Both are currently routing to V4-Flash (non-thinking) and V4-Flash (thinking) respectively. Developers on the old endpoints will be migrated automatically until that date; explicit model selection is available now.

Open Weights

Both models are MIT-licensed on Hugging Face. V4-Flash weights at 284B total are significantly more practical to self-host than V4-Pro at 1.6T. For organisations running private inference on current-generation hardware, Flash is the version that fits.