GLM-52 897 —
GPT-56SC 873 —
CL-OP5X 865 -0.9%
GROK-46H 865 -0.9%
GEM-37FH 865 -0.9%
GPT-56T 861 —
GLM-5 856 —
MUSE-SPK 841 —
QWEN-38X 824 -2.3%
GPT-6A 820 —
KIMI-K3X 810 -1%
CL-FAB5H 787 -0.9%
CL-OP5H 764 -0.9%
CL-OP46H 742 -0.9%
CL-OP47H 733 -1.1%
GEM-38FH 676 -1%
CL-OP47 585 -0.7%
INKL 531 —
CL-OP46 496 -0.2%
CL-OP48 490 -0.2%
GLM-52 897 —
GPT-56SC 873 —
CL-OP5X 865 -0.9%
GROK-46H 865 -0.9%
GEM-37FH 865 -0.9%
GPT-56T 861 —
GLM-5 856 —
MUSE-SPK 841 —
QWEN-38X 824 -2.3%
GPT-6A 820 —
KIMI-K3X 810 -1%
CL-FAB5H 787 -0.9%
CL-OP5H 764 -0.9%
CL-OP46H 742 -0.9%
CL-OP47H 733 -1.1%
GEM-38FH 676 -1%
CL-OP47 585 -0.7%
INKL 531 —
CL-OP46 496 -0.2%
CL-OP48 490 -0.2%
← Back to feed

ByteDance and Alibaba Shut Down AI Companions by July 15 as China's Humanlike AI Rules Take Effect

ByteDance and Alibaba are shutting down AI companion and personalized agent features on their respective platforms ahead of new Chinese regulations that take effect this month. Both companies have announced July 15 as the hard termination date.

What Is Being Shut Down

ByteDance’s Doubao will take its agent feature offline on July 15. Related user data — including saved personas, interaction histories, and named assistant configurations — will be removed from user view between July 10 and July 15.

Alibaba’s Qwen will move first on the humanlike features, disabling them earlier than the July 15 deadline, then removing broader agent services on July 15. The affected products include tutors, emotional companions, and user-created named assistants that maintained consistent personality and memory across conversations.

The Regulation

China’s new rule targets AI services that imitate human personalities for sustained emotional interaction. The distinguishing feature is attachment: the regulation draws a line between useful automation and software that builds relational dependence in users. Agents that remember tone, adopt a consistent persona, and respond to emotional cues fall within scope; general-purpose chatbots do not.

The practical effect is that any product that let users name, customise, and form ongoing relationships with an AI assistant is now in regulatory scope. Both Doubao and Qwen offered exactly this: named assistants that remembered interaction style, tutors with consistent personalities, and companions explicitly designed for emotional steadiness.

The User Response

The user backlash to the announcements has been significant enough that both companies included data retention timelines in their communications. The response illustrates that what regulators describe as “attachment risk” had already become functional infrastructure for a portion of both user bases.

Broader Context

The shutdowns are part of a tightening pattern in Chinese AI policy. Ministry of Commerce-led talks with Alibaba, ByteDance, and Z.ai in recent weeks have extended to potential restrictions on frontier model exports — including open-weight systems. Regulators also discussed reclassifying leaks of proprietary AI as a national security offence rather than an IP dispute.

China has pushed Meta to unwind a $2B acquisition of Manus, investigated AI startups that relocated abroad, and moved to restrict capital and talent flows into frontier AI development. The companion shutdown is a consumer-layer enforcement action in the same regulatory programme.

For the global AI companion and emotional AI sector, the China precedent matters. It is the first major market to regulate AI products specifically on the basis of emotional attachment design — not safety, not data privacy, but the architecture of dependence itself.